Models
How much each model writes for every website it cites, and how that changes with reasoning. Pick the models you want to compare.
Compare the models you choose
Pick up to six models. The map shows where each one’s typical answer sits; the table puts their answers side by side, one prompt per row, so every row compares answers to the same prompt.
◆ typical answer of each chosen model, against the other models on the same prompts. Grey dots are the models you didn’t choose. Above the solid diagonal: more websites per word than the others.
- Opus 5.521% more websites per word
- GPT-6.1 Sol17% fewer websites per word
- Gemini 3.640% fewer websites per word
- Qwen3.8-Max60% more websites per word
| Prompt |
21% more websites per word
18% shorter length
63% more websites
7 answers on 7 prompts, vs. the other models |
17% fewer websites per word
33% longer length
10% more websites
21 answers on 14 prompts, vs. the other models |
40% fewer websites per word
about the same length
50% fewer websites
11 answers on 10 prompts, vs. the other models |
60% more websites per word
32% shorter length
10% more websites
7 answers on 7 prompts, vs. the other models |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buyer journeyJapanese food buyersAll models’ middle: 6.3 per 1,000 words | Not run | Light6.34 websites · 638 wordsMedium6.84 websites · 591 wordsHigh6.29 websites · 1,463 wordsExtra High8.17 websites · 870 wordsMax3.616 websites · 4,465 words | Thinking · web search not recorded5.66 websites · 1,070 words | Not run |
| PricingFood quotations in JapanAll models’ middle: 6.8 per 1,000 words | Not run | High4.810 websites · 2,068 words | Thinking · web search not recorded4.95 websites · 1,026 words | Thinking19.811 websites · 555 words |
| PricingTaiwan-to-Japan alcohol exportsAll models’ middle: 5.0 per 1,000 words | Not run | Max7.110 websites · 1,408 words | Not run | Not run |
| PricingFood crowdfunding in JapanAll models’ middle: 10.0 per 1,000 words | Medium10.413 websites · 1,250 words | Max10.919 websites · 1,741 words | Thinking5.925 websites · 4,260 words | Not run |
| PricingFood e-commerce in JapanAll models’ middle: 12.1 per 1,000 words | Not run | Max10.918 websites · 1,659 words | Thinking · web search not recorded8.012 websites · 1,497 words | Thinking17.019 websites · 1,115 words |
| Location selectionFood manufacturing in JapanAll models’ middle: 11.8 per 1,000 wordsall 4 answered | Medium11.113 websites · 1,167 words | Max7.99 websites · 1,140 words | Thinking · web search not recorded1.61 website · 612 words | Thinking22.213 websites · 587 words |
| Daily demandJapanese daily foodAll models’ middle: 12.2 per 1,000 words | Not run | Max12.021 websites · 1,755 words | Thinking12.39 websites · 730 words | Not run |
| Pain analysisB2B food industryAll models’ middle: 6.5 per 1,000 words | High18.722 websites · 1,179 words | Not run | Thinking6.05 websites · 829 words | Not run |
| Social mediaFood buyersAll models’ middle: 17.0 per 1,000 words | Not run | High18.412 websites · 654 words | Thinking13.16 websites · 457 words | Thinking24.015 websites · 624 words |
| Buyer needsJapanese food buyersAll models’ middle: 8.9 per 1,000 words | Extra14.122 websites · 1,565 words | Max5.311 websites · 2,074 words | Not run | Thinking12.610 websites · 796 words |
| Buyer needsJapanese food buyers · version 2All models’ middle: 8.2 per 1,000 words | Extra9.016 websites · 1,776 words | Max4.913 websites · 2,642 words | Not run | Thinking11.912 websites · 1,007 words |
| RegulationsJapan cold outreachAll models’ middle: 14.4 per 1,000 words | Not run | Light · web search not recorded3.93 websites · 779 wordsHigh12.19 websites · 744 wordsUltra · web search not recorded16.611 websites · 661 words | Not run | Thinking17.79 websites · 508 words |
| Review searchJapan izakayaAll models’ middle: 0.7 per 1,000 words | Not run | High0.85 websites · 6,259 words | Thinking0.42 websites · 4,905 words | Not run |
| Competitors list upKALDI Coffee FarmAll models’ middle: 17.0 per 1,000 words | High19.213 websites · 676 words | High17.17 websites · 410 wordsHigh · web search not recorded22.910 websites · 436 words | Not run | Not run |
| Pain analysisKato Sangyo Co., Ltd.All models’ middle: 1.9 per 1,000 words | High2.56 websites · 2,396 words | High2.39 websites · 3,975 words | Thinking2.922 websites · 7,587 wordsThinking1.13 websites · 2,655 words | Not run |
| Head to headthe 1 prompt all 4 answered | 11.1 websites per 1,000 words (middle) | 7.9 websites per 1,000 words (middle) | 1.6 websites per 1,000 words (middle) | 22.2 websites per 1,000 words (middle) |
Within a row the prompt is the same, so the figures compare directly: the bar is websites per 1,000 words, on a scale shared by every answer to that prompt; the thin line is the middle answer from all models on that prompt. Across rows, prompts differ (from under 1 to 17 websites per 1,000 words), which is why the column heads compare each answer with the other models on its own prompt. Click a model’s name to show its answers on the map.
Websites per word, by model and reasoning
The more words a report needs for each website it cites, the more there is to read per source. Each answer’s websites per 1,000 words is compared with the other models’ answers to the same prompt. Bars show the typical answer; each circle is one answer.
What this counts, and what it doesn’t. A website is counted once per answer, however many of its pages are linked. The count says nothing about whether a website is reliable or how the answer uses it.
The shaded band is “about the same” (within 10%). avg is the middle answer from the other models on the same prompt; −50% and +100% are equally far from it. Rows with one answer are lighter. K3 is not shown: none of its answers had captured source links.
Shorter, or more websites?
The same answers on two scales: length across, websites up, both against the other models on the same prompt. Diagonal lines mark the same websites per word as the others, so an answer can get there by being shorter, by citing more, or both. Grey dots are the other models’ typical answers.
21% more websites per word
18% more websites per word
about the same websites per word
17% fewer websites per word
50% fewer websites per word
about the same websites per word
41% fewer websites per word
40% fewer websites per word
18% fewer websites per word
60% more websites per word
161% more websites per word
105% more websites per word
38% more websites per word
30% fewer websites per word
11% more websites per word
233% more websites per word
42% fewer websites per word
Both scales run from one fifth to five times the others’ middle answer; an answer beyond that sits on the edge as a dashed circle. Choose a reasoning level to show only those answers. One answer says little, so those maps are lighter.
Same model, same prompt, more reasoning
Only where one model answered one prompt at more than one reasoning level. Here the prompt is the same, so the figures are compared directly.
Regulations · Japan cold outreach
| Light | High | Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Per 1,000 words | 3.9 | 12.1 | 16.6 |
| Websites | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| Words | 779 | 744 | 661 |
| Other models | 17.7 per 1,000 words (dashed line) | ||
Web search not recorded for Light and Ultra.
Buyer journey · Japanese food buyers
| Light | Medium | High | Extra High | Max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per 1,000 words | 6.3 | 6.8 | 6.2 | 8.1 | 3.6 |
| Websites | 4 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| Words | 638 | 591 | 1,463 | 870 | 4,465 |
| Other models | 8.2 per 1,000 words (dashed line) | ||||
Pricing · Food e-commerce in Japan
| Medium | Extra | |
|---|---|---|
| Per 1,000 words | 9.7 | 17.3 |
| Websites | 10 | 20 |
| Words | 1,036 | 1,158 |
| Other models | 12.1 per 1,000 words (dashed line) | |
Location selection · Food manufacturing in Japan
| Medium | Extra | |
|---|---|---|
| Per 1,000 words | 14.4 | 13.0 |
| Websites | 7 | 9 |
| Words | 485 | 693 |
| Other models | 10.5 per 1,000 words (dashed line) | |
4 comparisons so far. Reasoning levels are each app’s own labels and are not comparable between vendors. More runs at every level on the same prompts are planned.
Based on 89 of 101 outputs on 15 prompts from 17 models, as of 2026-10-11. Facts, not rankings. How the numbers are counted
- Websites per 1,000 words: distinct websites linked in the answer (written without “www.”), divided by its length in thousands of words. Web addresses written out in the text are not counted as words.
- Versus others: each answer is divided by the middle answer from the other models on the same prompt. A model’s or reasoning level’s figure is the middle of those comparisons. Prompts differ a lot (from under 1 to 17 websites per 1,000 words), so answers are never compared across prompts directly.
- Reasoning: the level the app showed (some apps call it a reasoning level). “high” in older captures is the same setting as “High” and is shown as High.
- Left out: outputs whose source links were not captured. An output re-captured with its links joins automatically.
- Order: models in the library’s fixed order, reasoning levels from lowest to highest within a model. Chat and Work modes are counted together. Nothing is sorted by a value, and nothing is scored.